Articles delivered to section I and II are sent to the double-blind review (i.e. a double-blind review process - author / authors and reviewer / reviewers do not know their identity) to a specialist in the field addressed in the article. Based on the obtained anonymous review an article is accepted for publication by the Editorial Board. The Editorial Board informs the author about results of the review process and whether the article is accepted for publication without amendments, changes suggested by the reviewer are required or the article is rejected. Application of amendments indicated by the reviewer is a prerequisite for acceptance of the article. When the amendments are suggested by the reviewer or the article is rejected, the author receives a photocopy or scan of the review. The reviewer and the author of the article are not affiliated with the same institution.
BOARD OF PEER REVIEWERS – DOWNLOAD
year 2008
year 2009
year 2010
year 2011
year 2012
year 2013
year 2014
year 2015
year 2016
year 2017
year 2018
year 2019
year 2020